Captain's Report
Thames Valley Division 1
3 November 2010
Surbiton A 5.5 – 2.5 Maidenhead A
Board
|
Colour
|
Surbiton
A
|
Score
|
Maidenhead A
|
Score
|
1
|
B
|
Chris Briscoe
|
0.5
|
James Holland
|
0.5
|
2
|
W
|
Mark Josse
|
1
|
Liam Varnum
|
0
|
3
|
B
|
Nick Pelling
|
0.5
|
John Wager
|
0.5
|
4
|
W
|
Edgar Flacker
|
1
|
Stephen James
|
0
|
5
|
B
|
Stefano Bruzzi
|
0
|
Paul Janota
|
1
|
6
|
W
|
Paul Shepherd
|
0.5
|
Anthony Milnes
|
0.5
|
7
|
B
|
Ian Henderson
|
1
|
Peter Tickner
|
0
|
8
|
W
|
Angus James
|
1
|
Nigel Dennis
|
0
|
Rumours that the skipper was seen running naked
down the street in celebration after the team secured its first Thames Valley
Division 1 match point are greatly exaggerated! I will confess to some relief
after this match, though, after a tough start to our season.
Maidenhead deserve a lot of credit for making
it tough for us even though we fielded, on paper, one of the strongest sides we
have put out for a long time (our 8 board average ECF grade was 187).
It seemed like that, no sooner had the match
started (I think I was considering my 6th move), that the Board 1
encounter was over. Chris agreed a draw as Black against James, which he felt
was best given his position was perhaps a little worse. It took them about 15
minutes in total and I noted to Maidenhead’s captain, Tony, who I was playing
on Board 6, that I was glad we weren’t paying them appearance fees! Well done
Chris.
Next to finish was Nick on Board 3 who also got
a solid draw as Black against John out of one of Nick’s patented opening
systems. Well played Nick.
At this stage it was very difficult to predict
the outcome of the match. Mark was better on Board 2, Edgar looked about equal
on Board 4, Stef was in trouble on Board 5, I was
about equal on Board 6, Ian was worse on Board 7 and Angus was doing well on Board
8.
As time went by Angus continued to press and
secured a decisive material advantage against Nigel and really rammed it home
to secure a nicely played win on Board 8. Well played Angus.
Stef’s game was up and down. He recovered
from a dodgy opening, where he had looked lost, to get a reasonable position. Stef then went for a tactic which he thought would win the
exchange by sacking a knight in order to skewer Paul’s queen and rook.
Unfortunately, although it appeared that Paul had missed the skewer, it turned
out he had a “one mover” way of saving the queen that retained the extra piece,
so Stef called it a day. Unlucky, Stef.
Then, out of the blue, the decisive result
arrived on my score-sheet. Ian sidled over and wrote down 1-0 to him!!! The
last time I had looked he had been an exchange down but evidently he had created
a tactic involving forking a rook on c1 and a bishop on h5 with his queen on g5
that turned the tables. Great resourcefulness Ian, this shows the value of not
giving up and staying alert.
By this time I had missed what was close to a
winning line against Tony by choosing the wrong move order in a combination.
Tony defended very well to stay in touch, and although I ended up in a
marginally better endgame that I had control of, it looked drawn. Edgar’s game
had turned into an extremely interesting but very difficult to assess queen
ending. We could not count on Edgar winning. Hence I had to play on in my own
marginally better queen ending, declining a couple of generous draw offers by
Tony, in case Mark went down on Board 2 in what was an approaching a time
scramble.
I confess, although Mark continued to look
better, I was sweating a little as the clocks ticked down and the pieces buzzed
about the board. I did not fancy the long trip to Maidenhead to try to win my ending!
I need not have worried, though. Mark played well right until the end and kept
pressing right until the point Liam’s flag fell. Well played Mark, cool under
pressure.
At this point I offered a draw to Tony and the
match was ours!
Edgar adjourned his queen ending. This was his
first game for us and he said afterwards that he
felt a bit rusty. Despite that he kept a firm grip on the position and kept
making Stephen defend accurately. The adjourned position was given a pretty
rigorous analysis by the Flacker/Bruzzi/Shepherd triumvirate and we collectively
concluded that it ought to be drawn with best play. However we also noted that
it was a difficult defence to conduct 100% accurately and so Edgar choose a line
that gave Stephen the maximum chances of going wrong. At the resumption Stephen
reeled off the best defence for about seven moves but then made an error that
gave Edgar a very active king and a tempo while also placing his own queen in
a rather passive position. Edgar won in short order after that. Well played Edgar!
Paul Shepherd 28
November 2010
|